“That’s politically naive. We won’t win hearts like that!”
“Don’t criticise religion! We may want some religious people to join our cause!”
“Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!”
Who the hell put these people in charge? How can these people be put in charge?
Answer me this – what is the skeptic equivalent of Pope?
So your skeptical organisation may have an appointed leader. So what? What makes any given skeptical organisation the authority on all skepticism? What makes a skeptical organisation the skeptic equivalent of The Vatican?
Excommunicate a skeptic from your ranks and they’ll still be a skeptic.
There’s no grand Poo-Bah of skepticism because there can’t be one.
Don’t get me wrong. I have no problem with disagreement in good faith about tactics – it’s healthy and rather obviously necessary.
But… There’s a difference between simple disagreement, and authoritarian finger waving.